Pre-filed bill aims to scrap Alaska Measures of Progress

Jan 12, 2016

The AMP test fails to provide valuable data about student progress, says a Palmer lawmaker who wants to ditch the year-old test and replace it with a nationally normed assessment. 

Rep. Jim Colver addresses the Alaska House of Representatives, Feb. 2, 2015.
Credit Skip Gray/360 North

Representative Jim Colver (R-Palmer) has pre-filed a bill that would do away with the one-year-old Alaska Measures of Progress exam

Just months after AMP’s first run in schools last spring, it started to get a bad rap.

Because the test raised the bar significantly, scores came back significantly lower than previous years’ assessments. And unforeseen challenges had the test vendor rolling out those scores several weeks later than expected this fall.

But the issue that has Representative Jim Colver calling for the repeal of AMP? The test scores, he says, don’t give educators “usable” information about their students’ progress.

"I think it represents a failed experiment of top-down education," says Colver, "when we gear up for a mandate, and spend a lot of precious time that could be used in the classroom to take a test, and then we find out we can’t determine from that test if there’s any learning occurring, or what a student needs to improve on, because of the way the test is administered and scored."

Colver’s legislation would prohibit the state from administering the AMP test, which was developed for Alaska by the Kansas-based Achievement and Assessment Institute under a $25-million-dollar contract.

Instead it calls for a “research-based” test with results that “teachers can use to inform individual student instruction” and to compare their students to national norms.

For this alternate test, Colver points to the MAP, or Measures of Academic Progress test, which is already used as a benchmarking tool in many Alaska schools.

"The beauty of the MAP test is it gives instantaneous results, and it creates a learning plan," says Colver. "It pegs students nationally to where they’re at, for instance in reading or math, with other students around the country. But more importantly, it gives good valuable data, and it’s frequently administered in some districts several times a year to chart progress."

If passed, Colver’s bill would require the state to implement MAP or a “substantially similar system of assessments.”

Dropping AMP would likely leave schools without a standardized test for spring 2016; in that case, the state would need to seek a waiver from the U.S. Department of Education to be able to skip testing for a year.

The legislative session begins January 19th. The Joint House and Senate Education Committees will meet to discuss AMP testing on the 20th.